Change Is Hard

…but change is certain.

Update on truck safety legislation

9 Comments

We received an update email from the Truck Safety Coalition.  Part of it is below.  I wanted you to know what is going on since you’ve supported me through this roller coaster that is safety legislation.

 

“As you know, on Thursday June 19, the Senate began consideration of the FY 2015 Transportation Housing and Urban Development (THUD) Appropriations bill as part of a package of three appropriations bills.  Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), filed an amendment to the THUD bill which would protect the Hours of Service (HOS) rules governing rest periods and the amount of hours truck drivers may work each week. Joining Senator Booker in cosponsoring the amendment were Senators John D. Rockefeller (D-WV), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Sherrod C. Brown (D-OH), Richard J. Durbin (D-IL), Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI), Brian E. Schatz (D-HI), and Chris S. Murphy (D-CT).

 

Senator Booker’s Amendment was introduced as a response to the language inserted into the bill at committee markup (Collins Amendment) which would increase the truck driver weekly work week to over 80 hours while a study was performed on the HOS restart provisions.  The Booker Amendment would strip the Collins Amendment of its language to suspend the restart provisions, and prevent an increase in truck driver work hours, while preserving the study.

 

We have now learned that the THUD bill has been pulled from the Senate floor indefinitely due to unrelated issues on other legislation, and we need your support to ensure that when the THUD bill returns, if a vote is held, the Booker Amendment will have enough support to pass.  It will likely be a very close vote.  In addition, Senator Blunt (R-MO) has indicated that he may offer an amendment, identical to the Collins amendment, to the Senate Commerce Committee’s piece of the surface transportation authorization bill.  Right now, we are unsure when the Commerce bill will come up for vote.  But, as you can see, this dangerous anti-safety language will not be going away, and it is imperative that we keep the issue of truck driver fatigue in the media and public eye.”

 

This delay adds another wrinkle in the fight for safety.  It’s difficult to keep our issue in front of the Senators for an extended time and the trucking interests have deep pockets and will be in the Senators’ ears constantly.   I’ll keep you updated when I hear more.  Meanwhile, if your Senator is listed above having cosponsored the Booker bill, please take a moment to call him or her and let them know you appreciate them trying to save lives on our roads.

And thank you very much for your support.

 

Advertisements

Author: dawnkinster

I'm a long time banker having worked in banks since the age of 17. I took a break when I turned 50 and went back to school. I graduated right when the economy took a turn for the worst and after a year of library work found myself unemployed. I was lucky that my previous bank employer wanted me back. So here I am again, a long time banker. Change is hard.

9 thoughts on “Update on truck safety legislation

  1. Oh politics….things can never go smoothly, can they?

    I hope the bill is reintroduced soon.

    Like

  2. Don;t you wish there was just one person that could make the decision….they should follow the old adage “to many cooks spoil the broth” in this case “too many politicians are costing lives :(“

    Like

  3. So frustrating that politics feels more like purchasing. Really, really liking the idea of strict and short term limits.

    Like

    • Yes, it’s harder to keep the old traditions going (ie buying your Senator) when there’s a new person in every few years..but there’s also a learning curve and required experience…it’s all so complicated. No wonder we get nothing done.

      Like

      • Do you think there would be so much of a learning curve if “Senator-buying” weren’t a thing? I wonder if people would just have to figure it out more quickly. But then, I have never been a person to stay in the same position just because it’s what I know. I much more favor changing for potential benefits…

        Like

  4. Jeeeeez. So much of this seems like common sense, but legislators are not immune to pressure.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s